The accessibility of blogging technologies has a significant impact on the burgeoning dominance of internet knowledge over printed texts. I think that a lot of this issue centres around that of authorship, publishing hierarchies, time dynamics, and text lengths.
Blogs as a source of knowledge are both more easily accessible by a wide audience and more easily created. A blogger is not restricted by money or editing (other than his/her own). In an essay about blogging history, Kelly (
2004) argues that ‘the blog provides a form of free and instant publication and dissemination that circumnavigates the hierarchies and economics of traditional print publication. What is published is no longer dependant on what is considered valuable or financially viable by publishing organizations and institutions, but solely by what is deemed worthy by the blogger’.
The lack of external editing and censorship, one could argue, is a reason to discredit any knowledge presented in a blog. Heller criticises the authenticity and accountability of design blogs because, he says, bloggers ‘are protected by anonymity and emboldened by a format that allows anyone to say anything, at any time, without mediation or an iota of editing’ (2004:22). There is danger in online content being taken for ‘truth’ when it could be subjective knowledge or even false information. Something about having words typed, similar to that of printed text lends a certain authority to online text that it perhaps doesn’t deserve. Take for example, self-diagnosis of health issues by people simply searching online for their symptoms. This potentially is very harmful to a person. The question is, do blogs also command a certain authority that is undeserved, and if so, what are the implications? One might argue that the subjective voice of blogs may mitigate this by making clear it is one person’s idea(s), but there may still be the temptation to be influenced by this.
However, this lack of censorship is empowering in terms of models of power such as that of Foucault, who questions the absolute truth of knowledge and sees truth as being something constructed to impose ideas of what is right and true (Fillingham 1993:5-7). Blogs ‘take the power back’ by allowing knowledge production that does not come from the usual dominant groups of knowledge production.
Blogs are also a more accessible (technology permitting) form of knowledge. Any information or knowledge based on the internet can be accessed by anyone who has internet access. In terms of research, an unlimited number of students or researchers can access the internet, and so knowledge and ideas, whereas books are scarcer. Your library may have the book that you want but it may have only one copy and that maybe potentially unavailable.
The brevity and frequency of blogging, for many is a much easier form of obtaining information, news, opinion and entertainment than printed media such as books. Technology has sped up the pace of life and our consumption for media reflects this. Mortensen and Walker comment that brevity and word count flexibility of blog posts free bloggers from the necessity of producing only long, thought out ideas so that ‘nuggets of thought’ can be published (2002:265). Mortensen and Walker argue that for this reason blogs ‘elucidate the constant flow of thought and the ever-changing nature of research’ (2002:267). So in a sense, blogging can allow for an organic research course.
The brevity and frequency of blogging posts is of course also characteristic of the cyberage speed in which we conduct our lives. The small bite/byte size pieces of information, delivered frequently, are more consumable that an entire book or published article. Furthermore they can often be more up to date. Polynor notes that after the terrorist events in New York of September 11, 2001, bloggers often got information posted on the net before journalists could even report (2004:38).
Blogging may not supercede printed text or other forms of journalism, but may offer an alternate channel to information – one which is easily accessible, free, easy to read, and up-to-the minute.